This website requires Javascript for some parts to function propertly. Your experience may vary.

Page Air Compressor Guide
Join one of my courses on compressed air and air compressors. Click here.


Heat Recovery from Compressed Air Systems

Heat Recovery from Compressed Air Systems

Here's something most people don't realize: 70-90% of the electrical energy you put into a compressor comes out as heat.

At small scale (5-30 HP), that heat is usually vented to the atmosphere. The capital cost of recovering it doesn't justify the small savings.

But at larger scale (100+ HP, and especially 500+ HP), heat recovery becomes a massive opportunity.

I'm talking about:

  • $50,000-$100,000+/year savings for 200-500 HP systems
  • $200,000-$500,000+/year savings for 1,000-3,000 HP systems
  • $1,000,000+/year savings for very large facilities (5,000+ HP)

With payback periods of 1-3 years typical.

If you're running large compressors and you're not recovering heat, you're probably venting hundreds of thousands of dollars per year up a vent stack.

Let me show you how heat recovery works, where the opportunities are, and real projects I've worked on where heat recovery delivered exceptional ROI.


The Basic Concept: Where Does the Heat Come From?

When you compress air, you add energy. That energy becomes heat.

Energy flow in a typical compressor:

  • 100% electrical energy input
  • ~5% lost in motor inefficiency (becomes heat in motor)
  • ~95% goes into compression
  • ~5-15% leaves as compressed air (potential energy)
  • ~80-90% becomes heat (absorbed by cooling system)

Translation: If you put 100 kW of electrical power into a compressor, you can recover 70-90 kW of usable heat.

At large scale, that's an enormous amount of recoverable energy.


Heat Recovery Math: The Opportunity Size

Let me give you some real numbers:

Example 1: Single 200 HP (150 kW) Rotary Screw Compressor

Electrical input: 150 kW

Heat available for recovery: ~130 kW (87% of input)

Running 6,000 hours/year: 780,000 kWh of recoverable heat annually

If used to replace natural gas heating:

  • Natural gas equivalent: ~27,600 therms/year (at 80% boiler efficiency)
  • Savings at $1.00/therm: $27,600 per year
  • Savings at $1.50/therm: $41,400 per year

Heat recovery system cost: $20,000-$40,000 typical

Payback: 6 months to 1.5 years


Example 2: Four 500 HP (373 kW each) Centrifugal Compressors

Total electrical input: 4 × 373 kW = 1,492 kW

Heat available for recovery: ~1,340 kW (90% of input)

Running 8,000 hours/year: 10,720,000 kWh of recoverable heat annually

If used to replace natural gas heating:

  • Natural gas equivalent: ~380,000 therms/year (at 80% boiler efficiency)
  • Savings at $1.00/therm: $380,000 per year
  • Savings at $1.50/therm: $570,000 per year

Heat recovery system cost: $150,000-$300,000 typical (4 compressors, distribution system)

Payback: 6 months to 1 year


Example 3: Ten 1,000 HP (746 kW each) Compressors

Total electrical input: 10 × 746 kW = 7,460 kW

Heat available for recovery: ~6,715 kW (90% of input)

Running 8,400 hours/year: 56,406,000 kWh of recoverable heat annually

If used to replace natural gas heating:

  • Natural gas equivalent: ~2,000,000 therms/year
  • Savings at $1.00/therm: $2,000,000 per year
  • Savings at $1.50/therm: $3,000,000 per year

Heat recovery system cost: $500,000-$1,000,000+ (complex multi-compressor system with extensive distribution)

Payback: 3-6 months

The pattern: The larger the compressors, the more compelling the ROI. At 500+ HP, heat recovery is almost always a no-brainer.


Heat Recovery Applications: Where Can You Use the Heat?

Application 1: Process Hot Water (Most Common)

What it is:

  • Recover heat from compressor cooling system
  • Use for process hot water demand (cleaning, washing, preheating, etc.)
  • Typical water temperatures: 60-90°C (140-195°F)

Best for:

  • Food processing plants (washing, cleaning, sanitizing)
  • Chemical plants (process heating)
  • Pharmaceutical facilities (cleaning, sterilization)
  • Manufacturing with hot water demand
  • Boiler feedwater preheating

Advantages:

  • ✓ Year-round demand (not seasonal)
  • ✓ High utilization = best ROI
  • ✓ Relatively simple system design
  • ✓ Displaces expensive natural gas or electric heating

Design considerations:

  • Needs continuous or frequent hot water demand for good ROI
  • Storage tank required to buffer supply/demand mismatches
  • Backup heating (boiler) needed when compressors are down

Typical ROI: 1-3 year payback if continuous hot water demand exists


Application 2: Space Heating

What it is:

  • Recover heat for building HVAC
  • Heat air via heat exchanger, distribute via ductwork
  • Typical air temperatures: 50-80°C (120-175°F)

Best for:

  • Facilities in cold climates
  • Large indoor spaces (warehouses, manufacturing floors)
  • Buildings with significant heating demand

Advantages:

  • ✓ Large heat demand in winter (can absorb all recovered heat)
  • ✓ Reduces heating fuel costs
  • ✓ Can heat large spaces efficiently

Disadvantages:

  • ✗ Seasonal (only useful during heating season)
  • ✗ Low utilization in warm climates or summer months
  • ✗ Lower ROI than year-round applications

Design considerations:

  • Size system for average winter demand (not peak cold day)
  • Backup heating required
  • Consider heat storage for night/weekend operation when building is unoccupied

Typical ROI: 2-4 years in cold climates, poor ROI in warm climates


Application 3: Process Air Heating

What it is:

  • Use recovered heat to preheat combustion air, process air, or drying air
  • Applications: Ovens, dryers, furnaces, paint booths, etc.

Best for:

  • Industrial dryers (food, lumber, textiles, coatings)
  • Paint booth air heating (automotive, manufacturing)
  • Combustion air preheating for boilers or furnaces
  • Process ovens

Advantages:

  • ✓ Often year-round demand
  • ✓ High temperatures acceptable (doesn't need to be precisely controlled)
  • ✓ Displaces expensive process heating

Disadvantages:

  • ✗ Requires compatible process (not all facilities have process air heating demand)
  • ✗ May require air-to-air heat exchangers (more complex than water-based recovery)

Design considerations:

  • Match heat recovery temperature to process requirements
  • Ensure compatibility with existing process equipment
  • Safety considerations for flammable/explosive environments

Typical ROI: 1-3 years if significant process air heating demand exists


Application 4: Absorption Chilling (Advanced)

What it is:

  • Use recovered heat to drive absorption chillers
  • Turn waste heat into cooling (air conditioning or process cooling)
  • Absorption chillers use heat energy (not electricity) to produce chilled water

Best for:

  • Facilities in hot climates with high cooling demand
  • Data centers (year-round cooling demand)
  • Process cooling requirements (food, pharma, chemical)
  • Facilities with high summer cooling costs

Advantages:

  • ✓ Year-round utilization (cooling demand in summer when space heating isn't needed)
  • ✓ Reduces electricity consumption for cooling
  • ✓ Can provide cooling from waste heat

Disadvantages:

  • ✗ More complex system
  • ✗ Higher capital cost (absorption chiller equipment)
  • ✗ Requires higher temperature heat source (typically 80-95°C minimum)
  • ✗ Longer payback than simple hot water recovery
  • ✗ More maintenance (absorption chiller vs. simple heat exchanger)

Design considerations:

  • Coefficient of Performance (COP) typically 0.6-0.8 (every kW of heat input produces 0.6-0.8 kW of cooling)
  • Requires cooling tower for heat rejection
  • Best combined with other heat uses (hot water in winter, cooling in summer)

Typical ROI: 3-7 years (longer than simple applications, but still attractive at large scale)


Heat Recovery System Design

For Rotary Screw Compressors (Oil-Flooded)

Heat sources:

  1. Oil cooling circuit (PRIMARY - captures 50-70% of input energy)

    • Install heat exchanger in oil cooling loop
    • Typical oil temperature: 70-90°C (160-195°F)
  2. Aftercooler (SECONDARY - captures additional 15-25%)

    • Install heat exchanger in aftercooler circuit
    • Lower temperature: 40-70°C (105-160°F)

Combined recovery efficiency: 70-90% of compressor input energy

System components:

  • Heat exchanger(s) in oil and aftercooler circuits
  • Hot water storage tank (500-5,000 gallon typical)
  • Circulation pump(s)
  • Controls (thermostats, valves)
  • Backup heating (boiler, electric)
  • Distribution piping to points of use

Design tip: Size storage tank for 15-30 minutes of hot water demand to buffer supply/demand mismatches.


For Centrifugal Compressors (Oil-Free)

Heat sources:

  1. Intercoolers (between compression stages)

    • Multiple stages = multiple heat recovery points
    • Temperature depends on stage (typically 60-120°C)
  2. Aftercooler (final cooling)

    • Lower temperature: 40-70°C

Recovery method:

  • Water-cooled centrifugal compressors have cooling water circuits
  • Install heat exchangers to extract heat from cooling water
  • Transfer heat to process water, glycol loop, or hot water system

Combined recovery efficiency: 70-80% typical (slightly lower than screw due to multiple stages and heat exchanger losses)

System components:

  • Heat exchangers (plate or shell-and-tube)
  • Hot water or glycol loop
  • Storage tanks
  • Distribution system
  • Controls and backup heating

For Oil-Free Rotary Screw Compressors

Heat sources:

  1. Water injection cooling (water-injected oil-free screw)

    • Heat removed from cooling water circuit
    • Typical temperature: 60-80°C
  2. Aftercooler

    • Additional heat recovery point
    • Temperature: 40-70°C

Recovery efficiency: 70-90% typical (similar to oil-flooded screw)

System design: Similar to oil-flooded screw, but heat recovered from water cooling circuit instead of oil circuit.


Heat Recovery Distribution Systems

Closed-Loop Hot Water System (Most Common)

How it works:

  • Heat recovered from compressors heats water in closed loop
  • Hot water circulates to points of use via insulated piping
  • Heat exchangers at points of use transfer heat to process
  • Cooled water returns to compressors for reheating

Advantages:

  • ✓ Can distribute heat to multiple locations
  • ✓ Isolated from process (no contamination risk)
  • ✓ Glycol can be used for freeze protection

Components:

  • Circulation pumps
  • Expansion tank
  • Insulated piping
  • Heat exchangers at points of use
  • Storage tank(s)
  • Backup heating

Direct Process Integration

How it works:

  • Heat recovered directly into process heating system
  • No intermediate loop (compressor cooling water directly preheats process water)

Advantages:

  • ✓ Simpler (fewer components)
  • ✓ Lower cost
  • ✓ Higher efficiency (no intermediate heat exchanger loss)

Disadvantages:

  • ✗ Less flexible (can only serve one process)
  • ✗ Compressor cooling tied to process operation
  • ✗ Contamination concerns if cooling water quality critical

Best for: Single large heat user located near compressor room


Real Heat Recovery Projects I've Worked On

Let me share some actual projects to show you what's possible:

Project 1: Petrochemical Facility

Facility:

  • Large petrochemical plant
  • 4× 800 HP oil-free centrifugal compressors (24/7 operation)
  • Previously: All heat vented to atmosphere via cooling tower

Problem:

  • Plant used natural gas boilers for process hot water (cleaning, heating, etc.)
  • 4 boilers running year-round
  • Natural gas cost: ~$500,000/year

Heat Recovery Solution:

  • Heat recovery system installed on all 4 compressors
  • Recovered heat fed into process hot water loop
  • Hot water storage: 10,000 gallon tank
  • Backup boiler kept online for peak demand and compressor downtime

Results:

  • Recovered heat: ~2,400 kW average (87% of compressor input)
  • Natural gas displacement: ~85% reduction (eliminated 3 of 4 boilers)
  • Annual savings: $450,000
  • Total project cost: $280,000 (heat exchangers, piping, storage, controls)
  • Payback: 7.5 months

Plus:

  • Reduced cooling tower load (lower makeup water, treatment chemicals, power)
  • Reduced emissions (less natural gas combustion)
  • Simplified operations (3 fewer boilers to maintain)

Project 2: Large Pharmaceutical Plant

Facility:

  • Pharmaceutical manufacturing
  • 3× 600 HP oil-free rotary screw compressors (8,400 hours/year)
  • Cold climate (Canada) with significant heating demand

Problem:

  • Building HVAC: Natural gas heating ($120,000/year)
  • Process hot water: Electric water heaters ($95,000/year)
  • Compressor room overheating in summer (required extra ventilation fan energy)

Heat Recovery Solution:

  • Comprehensive heat recovery from all 3 compressors
  • Winter: Heat used for building HVAC + process hot water
  • Summer: Heat used for process hot water only (building doesn't need heating)
  • 5,000 gallon storage tank
  • Integration with existing building HVAC and hot water systems

Results:

  • Building heating reduction: 65% (saved $78,000/year)
  • Process hot water: 95% electric heat displaced (saved $90,000/year)
  • Summer benefit: Reduced compressor room ventilation (compressor heat no longer wasted to room)
  • Total annual savings: $180,000
  • Total project cost: $145,000
  • Payback: 9.7 months

Additional benefits:

  • Better compressor room temperature control year-round
  • Reduced carbon footprint (35% reduction in facility natural gas consumption)
  • Qualification for utility energy efficiency rebate ($22,000)

Project 3: Automotive Manufacturing Complex

Facility:

  • Automotive parts manufacturing (stamping, welding, painting)
  • 6× 500 HP rotary screw compressors (oil-flooded)
  • Large paint booth operation (continuous air heating required)

Problem:

  • Paint booth makeup air heating: $280,000/year (natural gas)
  • Process hot water (parts washing, cleaning): $45,000/year
  • Compressors 24/7, paint booths 18 hours/day (5 days/week)

Heat Recovery Solution:

  • Heat recovery from all 6 compressors
  • Primary use: Paint booth makeup air heating (air-to-air heat recovery)
  • Secondary use: Process hot water
  • 3,000 gallon hot water storage
  • Backup natural gas heating for paint booths (peak demand, nights, weekends)

Results:

  • Paint booth heating reduction: 72% (saved $202,000/year)
  • Process hot water: 100% displacement (saved $45,000/year)
  • Total annual savings: $247,000
  • Total project cost: $185,000 (more complex due to air heating integration)
  • Payback: 9 months

Notes:

  • Paint booths run 18 hours/day but compressors run 24/7
  • Excess heat (nights, weekends) stored as hot water for Monday morning startup
  • System sized for average paint booth demand (not peak) - backup heating covers peaks

Project 4: Food Processing Plant

Facility:

  • Food processing (commercial bakery)
  • 2× 200 HP rotary screw compressors (6,500 hours/year)
  • High hot water demand (cleaning, sanitizing, process)

Problem:

  • Hot water: Electric water heaters ($58,000/year)
  • Space heating: Natural gas ($35,000/year)
  • Small compressor room (limited ventilation, summer overheating issues)

Heat Recovery Solution:

  • Heat recovery from both compressors
  • 2,000 gallon hot water storage tank
  • Integrated with existing electric water heaters (now just backup)
  • Also provides space heating in winter

Results:

  • Hot water: 92% electric heat displacement (saved $53,400/year)
  • Space heating: 45% natural gas reduction (saved $15,750/year)
  • Summer cooling: Reduced compressor room overheating (no longer needed extra AC)
  • Total annual savings: $69,150
  • Total project cost: $52,000 (2 compressors, relatively simple installation)
  • Payback: 9 months

Additional benefits:

  • Qualified for utility rebate ($8,500)
  • Better summer compressor room conditions (less heat rejected to room)
  • More stable hot water temperature (previously electric heaters struggled to keep up during peak demand)

When Does Heat Recovery Make Sense?

Based on dozens of heat recovery projects, here's when it's a clear "yes":

Clear Yes (High ROI, Fast Payback)

Compressor size: 200+ HP per compressor (or 300+ HP total)

Heat demand: Continuous or frequent (4,000+ hours/year)

Applications with best ROI:

  • Process hot water (year-round demand)
  • Food/beverage processing (cleaning, washing, sanitizing)
  • Pharmaceutical (cleaning, sterilization, process)
  • Chemical processing (process heating)
  • Boiler feedwater preheating
  • Paint booth air heating (if significant operation hours)

Typical payback: 6 months to 2 years

Energy price impact: Higher natural gas or electricity rates = better ROI


Probably Yes (Good ROI)

Compressor size: 100-200 HP per compressor

Heat demand: Seasonal (space heating in cold climate) or intermittent process demand

Applications:

  • Space heating (cold climates with long heating season)
  • Intermittent process hot water
  • Batch operations with hot water demand

Typical payback: 2-4 years

Consider: Utility rebates can improve ROI significantly (20-40% of project cost in some regions)


Maybe (Depends on Specific Situation)

Compressor size: 50-100 HP

Heat demand: Seasonal or limited

Typical payback: 3-6 years

Additional considerations:

  • Are electricity/gas rates high? (Better ROI)
  • Is there growth potential? (Install oversized system now, utilize more heat as you grow)
  • Are you replacing compressors anyway? (Add heat recovery during replacement for lower incremental cost)
  • Are utility rebates available? (Can make marginal projects viable)

Probably Not (Poor ROI)

Compressor size: <50 HP

Heat demand: No suitable application

Situations where heat recovery doesn't make sense:

  • Warm climate, no space heating demand, no process hot water demand
  • Intermittent compressor operation (few hours per day)
  • Very small compressors (<20-30 HP)
  • Portable/temporary compressors

Why poor ROI: Capital cost of heat recovery system too high relative to small amount of recoverable heat


Design Considerations & Best Practices

1. Size System for Average Demand, Not Peak

Why:

  • Compressors provide relatively constant heat output (when running)
  • Heat demand often varies significantly
  • Oversizing heat recovery = wasted capital, underutilized equipment

Better approach:

  • Size for 60-80% of peak heat demand
  • Use backup heating (existing boilers, electric) for peaks
  • Maximize utilization of heat recovery equipment

2. Include Thermal Storage

Why:

  • Compressor heat generation doesn't always match heat demand timing
  • Storage buffers supply/demand mismatches
  • Allows heat recovery even when demand is temporarily low

Sizing:

  • Hot water storage: 15-30 minutes of demand typical
  • Larger storage for batch processes or mismatched operation schedules

Example:

  • Compressors run 24/7, process uses hot water 12 hours/day
  • Large storage tank accumulates heat overnight, supplies daytime process demand

3. Design for Reliability & Redundancy

Critical considerations:

  • Heat recovery should NOT compromise compressor reliability
  • Backup heating required (compressors will go down for maintenance)
  • Controls must fail-safe (if heat recovery fails, compressor cooling must revert to normal)

Design principles:

  • Parallel heat recovery (compressor can operate normally if heat recovery offline)
  • Bypass valves (isolate heat recovery without shutting down compressor)
  • Redundant pumps for critical applications
  • Automatic switchover to backup heating

4. Account for Seasonal Variations

For space heating applications:

  • Size for average winter demand, not coldest day
  • Utilize excess summer heat for hot water (if demand exists)
  • Consider dual use: Heating in winter, hot water year-round

For year-round applications:

  • Maximize utilization by serving multiple heat users
  • Priority: Process > Domestic hot water > Space heating

5. Properly Insulate Distribution Piping

Why:

  • Heat losses in piping reduce net recoverable heat
  • Poorly insulated pipes can lose 10-30% of recovered heat

Best practices:

  • Insulate all hot water piping (minimum 2" insulation for pipes up to 2", 3" for larger)
  • Minimize piping run lengths (locate heat users near compressor room if possible)
  • Use pre-insulated piping for outdoor or unconditioned space runs

6. Integrate with Building/Plant Controls

Advanced systems:

  • Integrate heat recovery with BMS/SCADA
  • Monitor heat recovery effectiveness
  • Track energy savings
  • Automated switching between heat recovery and backup heating

Monitoring points:

  • Heat recovery water temperature (supply/return)
  • Flow rate
  • Energy delivered (calculated or metered)
  • Compressor cooling temperature (verify cooling performance not compromised)

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake 1: Not Sizing Storage Properly

Problem: Too small storage tank, heat recovery system can't absorb all available heat, excess heat wasted

Result: Lower savings than projected (50-70% instead of 85-95% heat recovery)

Fix: Size storage for at least 15-30 minutes of demand, more for batch processes


Mistake 2: Compromising Compressor Cooling

Problem: Heat recovery system restricts cooling, compressor runs hot

Result: Compressor shuts down on high temperature, reduced efficiency, shortened life

Fix: Design heat recovery as supplemental to normal cooling, not replacement. Compressor cooling is PRIMARY, heat recovery is SECONDARY.


Mistake 3: No Backup Heating

Problem: Rely 100% on heat recovery, no backup when compressors down for maintenance

Result: Lost production or emergency heating equipment rental

Fix: Always include backup heating (existing boilers, electric heaters, etc.)


Mistake 4: Poor Distribution Design

Problem: Heat recovery installed but distribution piping poorly designed (undersized, long runs, no insulation)

Result: Large heat losses, low delivered temperature, poor performance

Fix: Proper piping design (size, insulation, minimize length)


Mistake 5: Not Considering Utility Rebates

Problem: Pay full cost of heat recovery without checking utility incentives

Result: Missed opportunity for 20-40% rebate

Fix: Before finalizing project, contact utility company and check for:

  • Energy efficiency rebates
  • Custom incentives for large projects
  • Pre-approval requirements (some rebates require pre-approval before installation)

Return on Investment Summary

Here's what heat recovery ROI looks like across different compressor sizes:

50-100 HP (single compressor):

  • Annual savings: $15,000-$35,000
  • Project cost: $15,000-$35,000
  • Payback: 1-3 years (if good heat demand match)

100-200 HP (single compressor):

  • Annual savings: $30,000-$65,000
  • Project cost: $20,000-$50,000
  • Payback: 6 months - 2 years

200-500 HP (single or multiple compressors):

  • Annual savings: $60,000-$150,000
  • Project cost: $40,000-$100,000
  • Payback: 4-18 months

500-1,000 HP (multiple compressors):

  • Annual savings: $150,000-$300,000
  • Project cost: $75,000-$200,000
  • Payback: 3-15 months

1,000-3,000 HP (large facility):

  • Annual savings: $300,000-$900,000
  • Project cost: $150,000-$400,000
  • Payback: 2-12 months

3,000+ HP (very large facility):

  • Annual savings: $900,000-$3,000,000+
  • Project cost: $400,000-$1,000,000+
  • Payback: 2-10 months

The pattern: Larger compressors = faster payback and higher absolute savings.


Next Steps: Evaluating Heat Recovery for Your Facility

Step 1: Calculate Recoverable Heat

Data needed:

  • Total compressor horsepower
  • Operating hours per year
  • Current cooling method (air or water)

Calculation:

  • Recoverable heat (kW) = HP × 0.746 × 0.85
  • Annual recoverable heat (kWh) = Recoverable heat (kW) × operating hours

Step 2: Identify Heat Demand

Questions to answer:

  • Do you have process hot water demand? (How much? When?)
  • Do you heat your building? (How much? Fuel type? Cost?)
  • Do you have process air heating? (Dryers, ovens, paint booths?)
  • Do you have cooling demand that could use absorption chilling?

Collect data:

  • Natural gas bills (for heating)
  • Electric bills (for electric heating or hot water)
  • Heating hours per year
  • Typical temperatures required

Step 3: Estimate Savings

Calculate potential savings:

  • Natural gas displacement: kWh of heat ÷ boiler efficiency ÷ 29.3 = therms saved
  • Savings = therms saved × gas price per therm

Example:

  • 500,000 kWh/year recoverable heat
  • Displaces natural gas at 80% boiler efficiency
  • Therms saved: 500,000 ÷ 0.80 ÷ 29.3 = 21,400 therms
  • At $1.20/therm: Savings = $25,680/year

Step 4: Get Quotes & Check Rebates

Get quotes from:

  • Compressor OEM (may offer heat recovery packages)
  • Mechanical contractors specializing in heat recovery
  • HVAC contractors (for integration with building systems)

Check for utility rebates:

  • Contact your utility company
  • Ask about energy efficiency rebates or custom incentives
  • Get requirements (pre-approval, monitoring, verification)

Step 5: Calculate ROI & Make Decision

Total Cost of Ownership:

  • Capital cost (minus rebates)
  • Annual savings
  • Payback period
  • 20-year net savings

Example decision:

  • Capital cost: $75,000
  • Utility rebate: -$18,000
  • Net cost: $57,000
  • Annual savings: $45,000
  • Payback: 1.3 years
  • 20-year savings: $900,000

Decision: YES (strong ROI)


Recommended Resources

Overall System Optimization:
Compressed Air System Optimization - Complete guide to compressed air system energy efficiency including heat recovery, leak detection, pressure optimization, and control strategies

Multi-Compressor Systems:
Multi-Compressor Control & Sequencing - How to coordinate multiple compressors for maximum efficiency (often combined with heat recovery for comprehensive energy savings)

Large Systems:
Large Industrial Systems Buying Guide - System design for facilities with large compressors where heat recovery ROI is most compelling

Tools:
Compressed Air System Simulator - Model your system including heat recovery ROI calculations

Training:
Industrial Compressed Air Systems Course - Comprehensive training on large-scale system design, energy optimization, and heat recovery implementation


Bottom Line

If you're running compressors totaling 200+ HP and you have a continuous or frequent heat demand, heat recovery is almost always worth investigating.

The opportunity:

  • 70-90% of compressor electrical input can be recovered as useful heat
  • $50,000-$500,000+/year savings typical for medium-to-large facilities
  • Payback often 6 months to 2 years

The investment:

  • $20,000-$300,000+ depending on system size and complexity
  • 4-12 weeks typical for design and installation

The return:

  • Ongoing savings for 15-25+ years
  • Reduced carbon footprint (displacing fossil fuel heating)
  • Better compressor room temperature control
  • Potential utility rebates (20-40% of project cost)

At large scale, NOT recovering heat is like running a space heater 24/7 and venting all the heat outside while paying to heat your building with a separate boiler.

It doesn't make sense.

Need help evaluating heat recovery for your facility? Post in the Q&A forum and I'll help you calculate your potential savings and ROI.