Common Energy Wasters in Compressed Air Systems

If you're running a compressed air system in a manufacturing plant, you're probably wasting 20-40% of the energy you're paying for.

That's not a guess—it's what I find in plant after plant after plant.

Here's what that looks like in real dollars: A typical 100 HP compressor costs about $45,000 per year to run. That means you're throwing away $9,000-$18,000 annually on waste that's completely fixable.

Over 20+ years, I've audited hundreds of compressed air systems. The problems are almost always the same: leaks, excessive pressure, pressure drop, and poor control strategies. I call these THE BIG 4 Energy Wasters.

The good news? These are systematic, measurable, fixable problems. Most have payback periods under a year—some under 6 months.

Let me show you exactly where your money is going and what to do about it.

Energy Waster #1: Air Leaks (The Silent Money Burner)

This is the #1 energy waste I find in manufacturing plants. Not sometimes. Every single time.

The Numbers That Wake People Up

A 1/4" leak at 100 PSI wastes approximately:

• 100 CFM of compressed air
• 25 kW of electrical power (continuous)
• $2,500-$3,500 per year in electricity costs

Just one leak.

The typical factory I walk into has 20-30% total air loss from hundreds of small leaks scattered everywhere. On a 100 HP system (75 kW), that's:

• 15-22 kW wasted continuously
• 90,000-132,000 kWh wasted per year
• $9,000-$13,500 per year thrown away

And most plant managers have no idea.

Where I Find Leaks (In Order of Frequency)

1. Quick-Disconnect Couplings - #1 Culprit

These are the worst offenders. Every time you connect/disconnect, the seal wears a little. After hundreds of cycles, they leak significantly.

Where: Everywhere you have portable tools or flexible connections
Solution: Replace worn couplings ($5-15 each), or switch to better quality couplings

2. Threaded Fittings on Pneumatic Equipment

Vibration loosens fittings over time. Thread sealant deteriorates. NPT threads are tapered and inherently prone to leaks.

Where: Pneumatic cylinders, FRLs, manifolds, valve connections
Solution: Re-tighten or re-seal with proper thread sealant/tape

3. Old Rubber Hoses with Cracks

Rubber air hoses age, crack, and leak. Especially near fittings and in areas exposed to heat or chemicals.

Where: Tool hoses, pneumatic connections, temporary setups that became permanent
Solution: Replace aged hoses ($10-50 each depending on length)

4. Pneumatic Cylinders with Worn Seals

Cylinder rod seals and piston seals wear out from use. Air leaks past worn seals.

Where: Automated equipment, clamping systems, actuators
Solution: Rebuild cylinders or replace seals ($20-200 per cylinder depending on size)

5. Unused Drops - The "Ghost Leaks"

This one surprises people. Old equipment removed years ago, but the air drop is still connected and leaking.

Where: Empty wall drops, abandoned equipment locations, closed-off production areas
Solution: Cap or remove unused drops (free or minimal cost)

6. Pressure Regulators and FRLs

Diaphragms wear out, adjustment screws develop leaks, filter bowls crack.

Where: Point-of-use regulation, equipment supply lines
Solution: Rebuild or replace leaking units ($30-150 each)

7. Compressor Unload Valves

The compressor's own inlet valve can leak when unloaded, wasting air.

Where: Inside the compressor package
Solution: Rebuild or replace inlet valve/unloader ($200-800)

The Leak Detection Process

You can't fix what you can't find. Here's the systematic approach:

1. Get an Ultrasonic Leak Detector

Cost: $1,000-$3,000 for a decent unit
Payback: Weeks (seriously)

Ultrasonic detectors hear the high-frequency sound of air leaks that your ears can't detect. They work in noisy factories. They find leaks you'd never find otherwise.

Alternative: Walk around with a spray bottle of soapy water. Cheaper, but way more time-consuming and you'll miss 70% of the leaks.

2. Systematic Tagging

As you find leaks:

• Tag each one with location and estimated size
• Rate by severity (small/medium/large)
• Photograph for documentation
• Log into spreadsheet

Why: Track progress, prioritize repairs, justify costs

3. Fix Biggest First

Priority order:

1. Large leaks (1/4" and up) - highest ROI
2. Medium leaks (1/8" to 1/4")
3. Small leaks (under 1/8")
4. Unused drops and abandoned equipment

A single large leak can waste more air than 20 small leaks combined.

4. Re-Audit Quarterly

Critical: New leaks always develop. Equipment vibrates, fittings loosen, hoses age.

Schedule quarterly leak audits. Track total leak rate over time. This becomes a KPI for your compressed air system.

Measuring Leak Rate

The Shutdown Test (Most Accurate):

1. Shut down all air-using equipment (weekend or shutdown period)
2. Pressurize system to normal operating pressure
3. Shut off compressor
4. Measure pressure decay over time

Calculation:

• System volume (gallons) × Pressure drop (PSI) × Time (minutes) = Leak rate

Interpretation:

• Under 10% of compressor capacity = Good
• 10-20% = Average (typical factory)
• 20-30% = Bad (significant waste)
• Over 30% = Terrible (massive waste)

Example:

• 1,000 gallon system drops from 100 to 90 PSI in 10 minutes
• That's 10% pressure drop in 10 min = ~20% leak rate
• On a 100 CFM compressor = 20 CFM wasted = $5,000-$7,000/year

Cost vs Savings

Leak Detection Investment:

• Ultrasonic detector: $1,000-$3,000
• Labor for detection: 4-8 hours
• Repair materials (fittings, hoses, etc.): $200-$1,000
• Labor for repairs: 8-40 hours depending on number of leaks

Total cost: $2,000-$8,000 typical

Annual savings on 100 HP system:

• Reduce leaks from 25% to 10%: Save 15% = $6,750/year
• Reduce from 30% to 10%: Save 20% = $9,000/year

Payback: 3-15 months, often under 6 months

ROI: This is often the fastest payback of ANY energy efficiency upgrade.

Energy Waster #2: Excessive System Pressure (The "Just In Case" Trap)

The trap: "We run at 120 PSI to make sure everyone has enough pressure."

The reality: Most pneumatic tools need 90 PSI.

The Hidden Cost of Extra Pressure

Energy penalty: Every 2 PSI increase = approximately 1% more energy consumption.

Why? Higher pressure means:

• More compression work (more energy input)
• More air through every leak (higher pressure = more flow through holes)
• More wear on equipment

Real example:

• Plant running at 120 PSI
• Actual max requirement: 95 PSI
• That's 25 PSI overpressure
• Energy waste: ~12.5% = $5,625/year on 100 HP system

And all we did to fix it: Turn a dial.

Why Plants Run at Excessive Pressure

Reason #1: "That's what we've always done"

Setup years ago at 120 PSI. Nobody's questioned it since. Tools work fine. Why change?

Answer: Because you're wasting thousands of dollars per year.

Reason #2: Compensation for Pressure Drop

Plant has 20 PSI pressure drop from compressor to far end. Solution? Turn up compressor pressure.

Problem: This wastes energy throughout the ENTIRE system, not just at the far end.

Better solution: Fix the pressure drop (see Energy Waster #3)

Reason #3: One High-Pressure Application

Maybe you have ONE tool that needs 110 PSI. So the whole system runs at 120 PSI.

Problem: 99% of your air uses 90 PSI. You're over-pressurizing everything for one tool.

Better solution: Install a point-of-use booster pump for that specific application ($500-$2,000). Run main system at 100 PSI. Save thousands per year.

The Leak Multiplication Effect

Here's what most people miss: Higher pressure makes leaks worse.

Flow through a hole increases with pressure. Double the pressure, you don't double the flow—you get 1.4× the flow.

Example:

• 1/4" leak at 100 PSI: 100 CFM wasted
• Same leak at 120 PSI: 115 CFM wasted

Running 20% higher pressure:

• Wastes 10% more energy through compression
• Wastes 15% more air through leaks
• Combined effect: ~25% higher leak-related energy waste

Vicious cycle:

1. Run at high pressure
2. Leaks waste more air
3. "Need more capacity"
4. Buy bigger compressor
5. Still wasting 25-30% through leaks

How to Optimize System Pressure

Step 1: Audit Actual Requirements

Survey every piece of equipment:

• What pressure do tools actually need? (Check nameplates, not assumptions)
• What's the actual minimum for production?
• Are there high-pressure exceptions?

Typical findings:

• Most pneumatic tools: 90 PSI minimum
• Assembly automation: 80-90 PSI
• Packaging equipment: 85-95 PSI
• Spray painting: 30-60 PSI (pressure regulated at booth anyway)
• High-pressure exceptions: Maybe 1-2 specific tools

Step 2: Identify Exceptions

For any high-pressure applications:

• Can you install point-of-use booster?
• Can you regulate down from a higher pressure source?
• Is high pressure actually required or just assumed?

Point-of-use boosters:

• Cost: $500-$2,000
• Boost 100 PSI to 150 PSI for specific tool
• Pays for itself in months vs running whole system at 150 PSI

Step 3: Lower System Pressure Gradually

Don't just drop from 120 to 90 PSI overnight. People will panic.

Smart approach:

1. Drop 5 PSI (120 → 115)
2. Monitor for problems
3. Wait a week
4. Drop another 5 PSI (115 → 110)
5. Repeat until you're at optimal pressure

Target: Minimum reliable pressure + 5-10 PSI safety margin

Example: If actual minimum is 90 PSI, run system at 95-100 PSI.

Step 4: Measure Results

Track:

• Energy consumption (kWh)
• Production issues (any tools not working?)
• Compressor runtime
• System stability

Expected results:

• 5-10% energy reduction typical
• No production issues (if you sized correctly)
• More stable system (less pressure swing)

Real Example

Plant: Metal fabrication, 100 HP compressor
Before: 120 PSI system pressure
Audit findings: Max requirement was 95 PSI (impact wrenches)
Action: Lowered to 100 PSI (allows 5 PSI safety margin)

Results:

• Energy reduction: 10%
• Annual savings: $4,500
• Cost to implement: $0 (turned a dial)
• Payback: Immediate
• Side benefit: Reduced leak losses by ~10% (lower pressure = less flow through leaks)

Energy Waster #3: Pressure Drop in Distribution (The Hidden Energy Thief)

The problem: You're making 110 PSI at the compressor, but tools at the far end only get 85 PSI.

What you do: Turn up the compressor to 125 PSI to compensate.

What you're really doing: Wasting 7.5% of your energy (15 PSI ÷ 2 = 7.5%) throughout the ENTIRE system.

What Causes Pressure Drop

1. Undersized Piping (Most Common)

The Expansion Trap (I see this ALL THE TIME):

Year 1: Plant installs 1" piping for 100 CFM demand. Works great.

Years 2-10:

• Add new machines → tap into existing pipe
• Add production line → run branch from main
• Add packaging area → extend piping
• Add assembly station → another drop

Year 10: Original 1" pipe now feeding 5× the equipment it was designed for.

Result: Massive pressure drop. Far end gets 75 PSI instead of 100 PSI.

The Vicious Cycle:

1. Operators complain: "Not enough air pressure!"
2. Maintenance turns up compressor from 100 to 110 PSI
3. Six months later: "Still not enough!"
4. Turn it up to 115 PSI
5. A year later: "We need more air!"
6. Now running at 125 PSI to get 85 PSI at the far end

Why this costs money:

• Wasting 12.5% extra energy (25 PSI over target = 12.5%)
• Making all leaks worse (higher pressure = more flow)
• Wearing out equipment faster
• Still have the pressure drop problem—just masked it

Pipe Sizing Rule of Thumb:

Target: Maximum 1 PSI drop per 100 feet of pipe

2. Dirty Filters

Filters clog over time. Clogged filter = massive pressure drop.

Symptoms:

• Pressure gauge before filter shows 100 PSI
• Pressure gauge after filter shows 85 PSI
• 15 PSI drop across ONE filter

Common mistake: People forget to change filters. "It's automatic" mindset.

Solution: Change filters on schedule! Set reminders. Track differential pressure.

3. Dead-End Piping Layouts

Branch/Tree layout:

• Air flows through main line, branches off to each area
• Far branches are dead-ends
• Long pipe runs with cumulative pressure drop
• No redundancy

Problems:

• Highest pressure drop at farthest points
• Can't isolate sections without shutting down everything

4. Too Many Bends and Fittings

Every elbow, tee, reducer adds pressure drop. Multiply that by dozens of fittings...

Each 90° elbow = equivalent to 3-5 feet of straight pipe

Long pipe run with 20 elbows? You just added 60-100 feet of equivalent length.

Measuring Pressure Drop

What you need:

• Pressure gauges (accurate to ±1 PSI)
• Locations: Compressor discharge, main header at various points, far ends of plant

Target: Maximum 10 PSI total drop from compressor to farthest point of use (5 PSI is ideal)

What I typically find: 15-25 PSI drop (way too high)

Solutions to Pressure Drop

Solution #1: Upgrade Undersized Piping

Identify worst sections (highest pressure drop). Replace with larger pipe.

Typical project:

• Replace 200 feet of 1" pipe with 2" pipe
• Cost: $2,000-$5,000 in materials and labor
• Pressure drop reduction: 15 PSI to 5 PSI (10 PSI improvement)
• Energy savings: 5% = $2,250/year (100 HP system)
• Payback: 1-2.5 years

Pro tip: Don't have to replace everything. Find the bottlenecks (main headers, high-flow sections) and upgrade those.

Solution #2: Convert to Ring Main (Loop) Layout

Instead of dead-end branches, create a closed loop. Air can flow in both directions to any point.

Advantages:

• Lower pressure drop (air takes shortest path)
• Redundancy (can isolate section without shutting down)
• Easy to expand (tap into loop anywhere)

Cost: $5,000-$20,000 depending on plant size

ROI: 2-4 years from energy savings plus reliability benefit

Solution #3: Actually Change Your Filters

Simple fix:

• Set up filter change schedule
• Train operators to check differential pressure
• Stock replacement elements
• Change when differential hits 5-10 PSI

Cost: $50-$200 per filter element

Benefit: Eliminate 5-15 PSI unnecessary pressure drop

Solution #4: Add Receivers Near High-Demand Areas

Large receiver near high-demand equipment (injection molding, packaging) buffers short-term demand peaks.

Benefit:

• Reduces pressure swings
• Allows you to run smaller piping to that area
• Compressor doesn't see the peaks (runs more steadily)

Cost: $2,000-$8,000 for receiver + installation

Payback: 1-3 years from improved efficiency and reduced piping costs

Real Example

Plant: Automotive parts manufacturing, 150 HP system
Problem: Making 125 PSI at compressor, far end getting 90 PSI (35 PSI drop!)

Investigation:

• Original 1-1/2" main header extended 400 feet over the years
• Now pushing 400 CFM through pipe sized for 150 CFM
• Multiple dirty filters (never changed in 2+ years)
• Dead-end layout

Solutions implemented:

1. Replaced main header with 3" pipe: $8,000
2. Created partial loop to new production area: $4,000
3. Changed all filters: $600
4. Set up filter change schedule: $0

Total cost: $12,600

Results:

• Pressure drop: 35 PSI → 8 PSI (27 PSI reduction!)
• Lowered compressor setpoint from 125 to 100 PSI
• Energy savings: 12.5% = $8,400/year

Payback: 18 months

Plus: More stable pressure, production quality improved, operators happy

Energy Waster #4: Inefficient Compressor Control (The Unload Waste)

If you're running an old fixed-speed load/unload compressor for variable demand, you're probably wasting 20-35% of your energy during part-load operation.

The Load/Unload Problem

How it works:

• Demand drops below compressor capacity
• Compressor unloads (stops compressing air)
• Motor keeps running at full speed
• Inlet valve closes
• Compressor makes zero air but still burns 15-35% of full power

The waste:

• You're paying for electricity to produce zero air
• Unload time wastes energy
• More unload time = more waste

How Bad Is It?

Example: 100 HP Compressor

• Full load power: 75 kW
• Unloaded power: 15-25 kW (20-35% of full load)
• Runs unloaded 40% of the time (common in batch manufacturing)

Calculation:

• Unloaded: 20 kW × 2,400 hrs/year = 48,000 kWh/year wasted
• Cost: $4,800/year at $0.10/kWh

Just thrown away. Producing zero air.

The Variable Speed Drive (VSD) Solution

How VSD works:

• Motor speed adjusts to match actual air demand
• Need 50% capacity? Motor runs at ~50% speed
• Need 75% capacity? Motor runs at ~75% speed
• Power consumption matches demand closely

Energy savings:

• At 50% load: VSD uses ~60% power, load/unload uses ~70-80% power
• At 75% load: VSD uses ~80% power, load/unload uses ~85-90% power
• Typical savings: 20-35% at part-load conditions

VSD Economics

Cost premium over fixed-speed:

• VSD premium: $10,000-$20,000 (for similar sized compressor)
• Or retrofit existing compressor: $8,000-$15,000

Energy savings (depends on load profile):

• High part-load operation (30-70% load): $8,000-$15,000/year
• Moderate part-load (70-90% load): $3,000-$8,000/year
• Constant full-load: $500-$2,000/year (minimal benefit)

Payback:

• High part-load: 1-2 years
• Moderate part-load: 2-4 years
• Constant full-load: 5-10 years (not worth it)

When VSD Makes Sense

Great fit:

• Variable demand (batch manufacturing, packaging lines)
• Compressor runs part-load more than 50% of time
• Single compressor serving variable demand
• You're replacing an aging fixed-speed unit anyway

Example applications:

• Packaging lines (run hard during production, idle during changeovers)
• Batch manufacturing
• Facilities with day/night demand variation
• Injection molding (cyclical demand)

Poor fit:

• Constant full-load operation (3-shift continuous production at steady rate)
• Multiple compressors where you've already optimized sequencing
• Very small compressors (under 20 HP - payback too long)

Alternative: Better Sequencing for Multiple Compressors

If you have multiple compressors, proper sequencing can achieve similar results to VSD:

Setup:

• 2× 75 HP fixed-speed compressors (base load)
• 1× 50 HP VSD compressor (trim)

How it works:

• Base compressors run full-load (most efficient)
• VSD trim handles variation (runs at part-load efficiently)
• Sequencer controller coordinates all units

Benefit: Base-load units run efficiently, VSD handles variation, overall system efficiency optimized

Cost: $5,000-$15,000 for sequencer + VSD trim compressor

→ Learn more: Multi-Compressor Control & Sequencing

Real Example

Plant: Electronics manufacturing, variable production schedule
Before:

• 100 HP fixed-speed compressor
• Runs unloaded 45% of time (nights, weekends, between batches)
• Annual energy: 450,000 kWh
• Cost: $45,000/year

Solution: Replaced with 100 HP VSD compressor
Cost: $55,000 (vs $40,000 for fixed-speed replacement)
Premium: $15,000

After:

• Annual energy: 315,000 kWh (30% reduction)
• Cost: $31,500/year
• Savings: $13,500/year

Payback: 1.1 years

Plus benefits:

• More stable pressure (±2 PSI vs ±10 PSI)
• Softer starts (less electrical demand peaks)
• Quieter operation
• Less wear from load/unload cycling

Bonus Waster: The Oversized Compressor Problem

This one deserves special mention because I see it all the time, and it creates multiple problems.

The Sales Pitch

Salesperson: "You're a serious operation, you need a rotary screw compressor. I recommend a 40 HP unit to make sure you have enough capacity."

Reality: Plant only needs 20-25 HP worth of air, and it's not running continuously—maybe 4-5 hours per day actual usage.

Why salespeople do this:

• Bigger compressor = higher commission
• "Better safe than sorry" sounds responsible
• Many don't understand the problems it causes

Why Oversized Screw Compressors Are a Problem

Rotary screw compressors are designed to RUN. They need operating hours to:

• Keep oil circulating and warm
• Expel moisture that condenses inside
• Keep seals lubricated
• Maintain proper temperatures

If your oversized compressor only runs 2-4 hours per day:

Problem #1: Moisture accumulates inside

• Oil stays cold, doesn't properly separate moisture
• Water condenses in oil reservoir
• Rust forms inside components

Problem #2: Oil problems

• Oil never reaches proper operating temperature
• Condensate emulsifies with oil (makes mayonnaise-looking gunk)
• Seals dry out from sitting idle
• Oil deteriorates from moisture contamination

Problem #3: Internal corrosion

• Components rust from moisture
• Air-end corrosion
• Valves stick

Problem #4: More problems downstream

• More moisture in air lines (cold oil doesn't separate well)
• Oil carryover issues

Real Horror Story

I tore down a 3-year-old 50 HP screw compressor that only had 1,200 hours on it (less than 1 hour per day average).

What I found:

• Inside was full of rust
• Oil was milky from water contamination
• Seals were dried out
• Air-end had corrosion

Owner thought he was being smart buying "plenty of capacity."

Cost him: $12,000 rebuild on a nearly-new compressor.

The Right Approach

Size for actual demand, not theoretical maximum:

• Measure actual air consumption
• Size compressor to run at least 50-60% loaded
• If usage is intermittent, consider piston compressor instead
• Or get smaller screw that runs more hours
• Or add large receiver to buffer demand (lets smaller compressor run longer cycles)

When bigger makes sense:

• You're planning expansion (but be realistic)
• Demand is truly variable and you need VSD anyway
• Multiple shifts with growing usage

When it doesn't:

• Single-shift operation with predictable demand
• Intermittent usage (a few hours per day)
• "Just in case" thinking with no real plans

Total Potential Savings

Let's add it all up for a typical 100 HP system running 6,000 hours/year at $0.10/kWh:

Annual energy cost: $45,000

Waste #1: Leaks (25% loss)

• Wasted: $11,250/year
• Fix cost: $3,000-$6,000
• Payback: 3-6 months

Waste #2: Excessive Pressure (20 PSI over target)

• Wasted: $4,500/year
• Fix cost: $0 (turn dial) or $500-$2,000 (point-of-use boosters)
• Payback: Immediate to 4 months

Waste #3: Pressure Drop (15 PSI compensated)

• Wasted: $3,375/year
• Fix cost: $5,000-$15,000 (piping upgrades)
• Payback: 1.5-4 years

Waste #4: Poor Control (40% unload time)

• Wasted: $4,800/year
• Fix cost: $10,000-$20,000 (VSD)
• Payback: 2-4 years

Total recoverable waste: $24,000/year (53% of energy cost!)

Total investment to fix: $18,000-$43,000

Payback: 9 months to 2 years

20-year net savings: $480,000 - $43,000 = $437,000

Your Action Plan

Phase 1: Find the Low-Hanging Fruit (Month 1)

Week 1: Assessment

1. Calculate baseline energy costs
2. Do shutdown test to measure leak rate
3. Measure system pressure (compressor vs far points)
4. Check compressor load/unload patterns

Weeks 2-4: Quick Wins

1. Fix obvious big leaks (fast payback)
2. Lower system pressure if over-pressurized (free money)
3. Clean/replace dirty filters (immediate benefit)
4. Set up auto-shutoff if not running 24/7 (easy savings)

Expected savings: 5-15% = $2,250-$6,750/year

Cost: Under $2,000 typically

Payback: 2-6 months

Phase 2: Major Improvements (Months 2-6)

Systematic leak program:

• Buy or rent ultrasonic detector
• Complete facility audit
• Tag and prioritize all leaks
• Fix leaks systematically
• Set up quarterly re-audit schedule

Pressure drop analysis:

• Identify bottleneck piping
• Upgrade critical sections
• Consider ring main conversion
• Add strategic receivers

Control system upgrade:

• VSD retrofit or replacement (if justified by load profile)
• Multi-compressor sequencer (if multiple units)

Expected additional savings: 15-25% = $6,750-$11,250/year

Cost: $10,000-$40,000

Payback: 1-4 years

Phase 3: Keep It Optimized (Ongoing)

1. Quarterly leak audits (they always come back)
2. Annual system performance review
3. Monitor energy consumption (set up tracking)
4. Train operators on best practices
5. Make compressed air efficiency a KPI

Recommended Resources

System Optimization:
Compressed Air System Optimization - Complete optimization guide

For Large/Complex Systems:
Multi-Compressor Control & Sequencing - How to coordinate multiple compressors efficiently

Heat Recovery Systems - For 100+ HP systems, another $50,000-$200,000/year opportunity

Equipment Selection:
Rotary Screw Air Compressor Buying Guide - Don't buy the wrong size!

Training:
Industrial Compressed Air Systems Course - Comprehensive training on system design, operation, and optimization

Tools:
Compressed Air System Simulator - Model your system and test optimizations before spending money

Bottom Line

THE BIG 4 energy wasters—leaks, excessive pressure, pressure drop, and poor control—waste 20-40% of compressed air energy in most plants.

That's $9,000-$18,000 per year on a typical 100 HP system.

The good news? These are systematic, fixable problems with fast paybacks:

• Leak detection and repair: 3-12 months
• Pressure optimization: Immediate to 6 months
• Pressure drop fixes: 1-4 years
• Control upgrades: 1.5-4 years

Unlike other energy efficiency projects, compressed air optimization often pays for itself in under a year.

You're already paying for the compressed air. Now stop wasting it.

Ready to start? Read the complete optimization guide or ask specific questions in the forum.