Calculation to convert Nl/min to l/min
6 Answers
Hi,
What you say is absolutely right. If you say "10 Nl/min it means 10 l/min in normal conditions, so it means 10 l/min at 1 bar (absolute)."
And when I say "50 Nl/min at 7 bar", what I mean to say is this:
50 Nl/min is the flow/capacity. (50 l/min at normal conditions). But the system is 7 bar. So yes, the l/min at 7 bar will be about 8 times lower.*
About your situation: are you sure the compressors capacity is given in l/s at 7 bar (not Nl/sec). Very often, even compressor manufacturers use the wrong terminology.
If the word "FAD" (free air delivery) is used, that's close to Nl/min, but not exactly the same.*
For example: Capacity FAD: 99 l/s -- means: 99 l/s is sucked in and compressed to (for example 7 bar). So the output flow will be about 8 times smaller.*
To be sure, compare your compressor to these examples:
- 15 kW air compressor running at 7.5 bar, gives 155 m3/h FAD
- 22 kW air compressor running at 7.5 bar, gives 217 m3/h FAD
Hope this explain it more :) It can be really confusing sometimes, even for me writing this right now :)
I highly recommend to check out my free course "Compressed Air Basics" - all this is and more is explained!
Good luck. Let me know if you need any more info.
Cas
* Updated October 2026: corrected the pressure ratio (about 8 at 7 bar, not 7) and the comparison between FAD and Nl/min. See my comment below for the details.
Also, you need to consider that Nm3/h and FAD are not exactly the same. FAD flow will depend on atmospheric pressure (altitude) and ambient air temperature and humidity. I have found an excel conversion tool from Nm3/h to FAD here:
https://herramientasdeingenieros.com/conversion-de-nm3-h-a-fad-para-aire-comprimido/
An update on my answer above, because two things needed correcting.
1. At 7 bar, the air is about 8 times compressed, not 7. You have to use absolute pressure: 7 bar gauge is 8.013 bar absolute. So the ratio is 8.013 / 1.013 = 7.9. Yves was right.
2. FAD and Nl/min are not the same number. They use different reference conditions. Normal litres (DIN 1343) are at 0 °C, FAD (ISO 1217) is at 20 °C. Cold air is denser, so the same amount of air takes up less volume. The difference is about 8%:
| Basis | Reference conditions | 1 litre FAD equals |
|---|---|---|
| FAD (ISO 1217) | 1 bar(a), 20 °C, dry | 1 l |
| Normal litre, DIN 1343 (Nl, Nm³) | 1.013 bar(a), 0 °C, dry | 0.92 Nl |
| Normal litre, ISO 8778 ("ANR") | 1 bar(a), 20 °C, 65% RH | 1.02 Nl |
| SCFM | 14.696 psi(a), 60 °F, dry | 0.97 standard l |
| Standard air (ASME) | 14.7 psi(a), 68 °F, 36% RH | 0.99 standard l |
So Iñigo's Kaeser with 11.76 m³/min FAD gives about 10.8 Nm³/min. If you need 350 Nl/min, you need about 380 l/min FAD.
Watch out: makers of pneumatic components often mean ISO 8778 (20 °C) when they write Nl/min. Then it's almost the same as FAD. If the datasheet doesn't say, ask.
And Matt is right too: FAD is the air at the compressor inlet, so in Nl/min a compressor delivers less at high altitude or on a hot day.
More in Free Air Delivery (FAD), and the flow converter does the conversion for you.
Cas
Share Your Knowledge
Have experience with this issue? Help others by sharing your solution.